I suppose it was inevitable with EU
elections on the horizon. Even so, the
advice never to discuss politics or religion with friends has never been proved
more appropriate. There weren’t many
people in The Duke but it didn’t take long for those within hearing distance to
get involved.
Sam has gone all UKIP, sounding like
Corporal Jones from Dad’s Army that kept saying “they don’t like it up ‘em,”
‘em being all the main parties. He’s
voted Conservative for as long as we’ve known him but the change may be a
reaction to him being a constituent of Maria Miller. Sam’s
loud comment that “she won’t like it up her next time she stands” had to be
explained to two elderly ladies who got a bit excited when they heard it. He has a point in the sense that none of the
major parties would discuss immigration or the EU until recently, but asked to
name another standing member of UKIP he was none the wiser than the rest of us.
Adrian reads more newspapers than most of
us and has Radio 4 on permanently at home and in the car. His point made sense. Our problem with both the EU and immigration
is that we don’t have any quality information.
Dependent on which politician is stating their case, they spout
statistics to prove their position, but heaven knows where they find their
numbers. Adrian says there is no
forensic statistical analysis, worth the breath used to deliver them. I think Jez made the same point more clearly by saying
they all talk bollocks. In that
circumstance, you seem left with no option but to take a gut feel punt on the
character of the person who states their case.
It raised another point.
How much do we actually know about the folk
we elect? Ben raised a moot point. What process did we go through when we
applied for a job? Inevitably it meant
producing a CV and going through an interview process. Clearly 15,000 or so constituents can’t
interview an individual who wishes to stand as an MP but the applicants could
be made to publish a detailed CV.
They’re applying to run the country and it would be nice to know if
they’d ever run anything in their lives. Based on the cock ups with most major
projects, the answer is probably no.
By now the entire audience in the bar were
involved in the discussion so Paddy decided to run his own poll. There were nineteen of us, including
publican Richie and his better half Pam.
The results were as follows for the EU election.
UKIP 12
Labour 2
Conservatives 1
Liberals 0
Jez said they’d get less on the day
Undecided 1
Don’t give a shit 3
According to Adrian, proportional
representation means that the ‘Don’t give a shit party’ will have
representatives in Brussels. As drink
was taken, a lively discussion ensued about the cost of standing as a
delegate. While unlikely, I would like
you to give serious consideration to how you use your vote if a DGS candidate
appears on your voting slip.
it would make more sense to have a 'no candidate' choice and if everyone selected that , there would be a lot less bollox to listen to!!!!
ReplyDeleteHalf agree. Just wish we could find out more about the people who stand rather than finding out after they're elected. CV's might act as an idiot screen!!
ReplyDeleteI am thinking of having a rubber stamp made that says "none of the above" for the next General Election. Also, I would insist that politicians should have successfully held down a proper job in the real world. That would be an indication of which ones could organise a piss-up in a brewery.
ReplyDeleteBased on the current lot we shall all be sober until we organise our own piss ups!
ReplyDelete